01 March 2020

Cars and the issue of the "perfect" scale

One thing I really love about 3D printing is the possibility to get my grubby mittens on stuff otherwise not commercially available in 28mm. And I can scale it to my own visual preference as well...

These three vehicles were part of a Kickstarter and actually the main reason I jumped in. Civilian or better civilian cars in army service are pretty hard to come by, even in 1/48 let alone 1/56. And if so they're pretty expensive too. Rubicon Models do a Citroen Traction Avant 11CV which admittedly looks a lot nicer than these models but seems to be sold out most of the time... of course not since I backed this Kickstarter though.


Anyway, for gaming models/ terrain pieces these are just perfect and are definitely a lot cheaper than their commercial counterpart. And as I said, you can scale the files to your liking and that's just what I did. Ever since having had a mate put a 1/48 Opel Blitz on the gaming table which towered over both terrain and figures I came to loath all the 1/48 is the "perfect" scale bogus and thought this just the right opportunity to proof my point.


My first test piece was this Mercedes V170 printed to match 1/56 exactly. But admittedly when painted and compared with my figures it looked a little too tiny for my liking. I couldn't really figure how two figures could actually squeeze in the front next to each other. So looks as if I might have been wrong after all...


This BMW 326 was scaled to 1/48 and initially was the one I liked the look of the most. But when checking sources online I realised it was much too high(by about two heads), even if it'd fit quite well width wise with the bulkier wargaming figures.


With both extremes tested I thought I might try something in between and printed this Citroen 11CV in 1/52. Now comparing all three I think this is the one I like the most as it sits nicely in between 1/56 which is actually too narrow for wargaming figures and 1/48 which is too tall.

So what did I take away from this? Well, obviously there's no such thing as the perfect scale for 28mm wargaming figures. As ever it comes down to personal choice. The one prefers his models to actually look as if the figures could actually squeeze in there, while the next (like me) doesn't like it when his toys are too high and too long. If we were totally consistent we would have to field vehicles which were roughly 1/48 in width while just 1/56 in length/ height... and that'd be a rather ungainly sight I bet. Maybe I should still try to print one such abomination, just for reference purposes though.

9 comments:

  1. Interesting experience, and I guess a good way to approach the whole thing. I think I'll be getting mad about this question one day (until maybe I get a 3D printer). Some vehicles look ridiculously small in 1/56 (i.ex. M8 Greyhound, Dingo armoured car, SdKfz222) but the tanks and trucks look huge in 1/48. Empress does their Vietnam vehicles in 1/50 which looks nice and you seem to confirm that 1/50-1/52 is a better compromise.
    I think it all boils down which figures you use (Empress are relatively slender for 28mm, whil Artizan are a lot chunkier) and the size of the games. I think the same issue is true for terrain though. Often 28mm terrain is too small, probably to enable players to have more on the table.

    Tricky questions ;) Thanks for shedding some light on this!

    ReplyDelete
  2. A very interesting post Nick...
    You have shown rather well the compromises that need to be made when combining miniatures that are a ‘size’(28mm)...and a fairly flexible one at that... with vehicles which are a ‘scale’(1/56-1/48)...
    I think it really comes down to how it looks to you and if it pleases you... and making or buying vehicles that look right beside the miniatures that you have collected would seem to me to be the best path to follow... even if it upsets the odd rivet counter...;-).

    All the best. Aly

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fantastic looking cars Nick! I generally prefer the 1/56 scale to the 1/48 but sometimes it just depends on the model.

    Christopher

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh! What a fantastic work on these cars!

    ReplyDelete
  5. The thorny subject of scale aside, the painting on the cars is just superb!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lovely work on all of these cars in varied scales, Nick. Although I like 1:48/1:50th for the availability. I agree about them being oversized sometimes. That said, I think, as with buildings and such, a lot have to do with representational perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Fantastic work all around. And the contrast you achieved on that black car at this scale is nothing short of genius. Well done!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great brush work on these babies Nick, really great stuff - even though they seem small... :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have long been agonizing over how to depict a Citroen painted in glossy back. Please could you share a few tips on how you went about doing the highlights?

    ReplyDelete